Just What is GasLightStation? CLICK the gray link just below:

Who (or what) is Gas Light Station!?

   Watch the trailer. We are "Equal Opportunity Offenders." Satire: our way of life. Parody: the tool of our trade. Irony: our ne...

Wednesday, September 14, 2022

LGBTQ Weaponizes Math

LGBTQ Weaponizes Math

Saratoga, FL: It’s long been the dread of all math students, myself included: “the story problem.” “When will train A overtake train B...?” Well, it turns out that the LGBTQRST community wants to overtake train HE now. These story brain-painers have become brain washers with the insidious injection of suggestions that induce gender dysphoria. Take for example this problem: “A man walks into a flower shop on a lovely spring day and buys 12 Gerbera Daisies. He accidentally drops 2. How many are left to give to his spouse?” Clearly, the problem insinuates his spouse is his husband because no “man” would ever buy daisies, let alone enter a flower shop any day other than February 14 or, more likely, February 15. How dare they invoke their gay agenda somewhere that we would least expect (or ever look for) it? What a perfect tool for perverting young minds.

We’re expecting to see more like this:
“If Billy has three roses and he gives two to Tommy, how many does he have left?”

“If Sarah drives her Camouflauge Hummer 40 miles an hour to the Army Surplus Store 80 miles away, when will she get there?” I feel this question is also incorrectly punctuated because clearly the word “she” should be in quotes.

“If Carl uses an ounce of hair product to Jooge a client’s hair, how many 8 ounce tubes of product will he need to Jooge all eight women on his schedule at the salon today?” Sure, the math is simple (Answer: 3), but the real problem is anything but!

Of course the libtards aren’t calling it what it is, “The Make Math Gay Again bill,” but we know better.


We Discriminate (Between the Finer Things) at the Academy Awards


 We Discriminate (Between the Finer Things) at the Academy Awards

The diminishing-in-numbers but still savvy home-viewers of the Academy Awards broadcast this year noticed that the show installed a whole new extra special upper elite luxury section in the front of the auditorium where the likes of Will and Jada Smith were seated. Somewhat similar to ultra-high-end box seats gifted to the uber-class at sporting events, this stunning move really set apart the polished from the merely “highly washed” masses in attendance at the ceremony which not only awards the mega-rich, Hollywood elite, but gives some occasional awards to the “nouveau célèbre,” seated in the far, far back.

What we are trying to do,” said one Academy member, “is distinguish between the haves and the have-it-alls.” “We purposely wanted to segregate the attendees,” said another member of the all black production team, installed as a victory for diversity. “It was a brilliant move,” said a spokesperson for a popular Hollywood insider journal. “They segregated the rich and famous from the super rich and world-famous. Previously, they only had a sort of front-of-the-bus, back-of-the-bus thing going.” It really put those attendees in the back of the second balcony “in their rightful place.” We asked the people in the nose-bleed seats for comments, but most just replied, “I hope to be there someday.”

Only the A-list, like Steven Spielberg, familiar with lists from directing ‘Schindler’s List,’ are worthy of such an honor.” In order to install the section where only a few dozen ultra-class legends could be seated, hundreds of regular (albeit previously sought-after orchestra section seats) had to be removed. “It was great because a lot of other people who think they deserve to be at the awards could no longer fit in, literally and figuratively. You know, all the people who the winners thank because the movie could never have been made without them. Those people. Let’s face it. They are NOT at the top-of-the-food-chain nor award winners. That title is reserved as special and truly means something.”

Surely, everyone must agree, it’s an honest and accurate reflection of society. Only the top .1% should take the spoils and real estate of the rest. These people literally should “Get a seat at the table.” The others clearly haven’t done enough or aren’t talented enough (or know enough “right people”) to get that seat. “Do you want to trample on the American public’s hopes and dreams? Let’s face it, they mostly tune in thinking that someday they will have a seat at the front table. And Hollywood is in the dream-making business.”